FILIPIN(e)O

FILIPIN(e)O

EVOLUTION OF THE FILIPINO

PHILIPPINE ARCHITECTURE HAS LONG BEEN FRAMED AS A SEARCH FOR IDENTITY — OFTEN BY LOOKING BACKWARD. THE RECURRING RETURN TO THE BAHAY KUBO REFLECTS A SINCERE DESIRE TO GROUND ARCHITECTURE IN PLACE, CLIMATE, AND CULTURE. YET WHEN IDENTITY IS TREATED AS SOMETHING FIXED IN THE PAST, ARCHITECTURE RISKS BECOMING NOSTALGIC RATHER THAN RELEVANT.

Filipino Architecture

WE BELIEVE FILIPINO IDENTITY IS NOT STATIC. IT EVOLVES.

Filipino Architecture

THE FILIPINO HAS ALWAYS ADAPTED—THROUGH CLIMATE, COLONIZATION, GLOBALIZATION, MIGRATION, AND TECHNOLOGY. ARCHITECTURE, THEREFORE, SHOULD NOT MERELY PRESERVE FAMILIAR FORMS, BUT TRANSLATE THE FILIPINO CONDITION AS IT EXISTS NOW AND AS IT IS BECOMING.

ARCHITECTURE MUST STILL RESPOND TO ENDURING FORCES—CLIMATE, MATERIAL REALITY, ECONOMY, CULTURE, AND HUMAN NEED. BUT IT SHOULD GO BEYOND PROBLEM-SOLVING. IT MUST CREATE EXPERIENCES, PROVOKE NEW WAYS OF INHABITING SPACE, AND FORM CONTEMPORARY ARCHETYPES THAT ARE UNMISTAKABLY FILIPINO WITHOUT BEING LITERAL.

Filipino Architecture

OUR WORK DOES NOT SEEK A SINGULAR “LOOK” OF PHILIPPINE ARCHITECTURE. INSTEAD, IT PURSUES A PROCESS OF EVOLUTION—ONE THAT IS INTUITIVE, RESEARCH-DRIVEN, AND OPEN TO EXPERIMENTATION. THROUGH THIS, WE AIM TO PRODUCE ARCHITECTURE THAT IS LOCALLY ROOTED YET GLOBALLY FLUENT; CULTURALLY RESONANT YET FORWARD-LOOKING.

Filipino Architecture

FILIPIN(e)O IS NOT ABOUT RETURNING TO WHAT WE WERE—BUT DESIGNING WHO WE ARE BECOMING.

KEY CONCEPTS OF FILIPIN(e)O

KEY CONCEPTS OF FILIPIN(e)O

THESE ARE NOT STYLES. THEY ARE LENSES – WAYS OF THINKING, DESIGNING, AND QUESTIONING.

01
02
03
04
05